Chapter 10

References

27 min read

Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7

AlGhamdi, E. M., Li, Y., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2026). Leveraging prompt-based LLMs for automated scoring and feedback generation in higher education. Computers & Education, 243, 105511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105511

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Austin, T. (2026, May 11). The Evolution of Bloom’s Taxonomy, And Where It Was Always Heading in the Age of AI. https://substack.com/inbox

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P. J., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the Business Fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty among Business Students. Undefined. /paper/Using-the-Business-Fraud-Triangle-to-Predict-among-Becker-Connolly/b6fd4e20a10b3577cd0abc2e04a5b6d71054efb8

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’21, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bergwerff, M., Dekker, M., Van Blankenstein, F., Romein, D., & Klaren, M. (2015). Tips bij toetsen: Handreiking voor docenten. Universiteit Leiden, Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen en ICLON. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/science/onderwijs/sterrenkunde/tipsbijtoetsen.pdf

Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, 435, 435–459.

Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_hDy-5KOro8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=seminal+1998+work+%22Inside+the+Black+Box%22+black+william&ots=sn87uuvQsm&sig=k6zHLvwvGq8lvcfONRF1odTXUqg

Black, P., & William, D. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Assessment Reform Group, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

Bone, M., González Ehlinger, E., & Stephany, F. (2025). Skills or degree? The rise of skill-based hiring for AI and green jobs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124042

Chen, A., Xiang, M., Zhou, J., Jia, J., Shang, J., Li, X., Gašević, D., & Fan, Y. (2025). Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert. Computers & Education, 226, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105198

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Christensen Hughes, J., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Student integrity violations in the academy: More than a decade of growing complexity and concern. Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge, 61–79.

Clauser, B. E. (2021). A History of Classical Test Theory. In The History of Educational Measurement. Routledge.

Clune, M. (2025, November 29). Colleges Are Preparing to Self-Lobotomize. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/11/colleges-ai-education-students/685039/

Corbin, T., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Dawson, P. (2025). The wicked problem of AI and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2553340

Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Dollinger, M., & Boud, D. (2024). Validity matters more than cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(7), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2386662

Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116

Digitale Overheid. (2025, February 26). Wat je moet weten over AI-geletterdheid [Achtergrondartikelen]. Digitale Overheid. https://www.digitaleoverheid.nl/achtergrondartikelen/wat-je-moet-weten-over-ai-geletterdheid/

Donald, J., Gail. (2002). Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Learning+to+Think%3A+Disciplinary+Perspectives-p-9781118308127

Dreschler, G., Gambrel, A., & Branum, J. (2025). A Case Study in Mindfully Integrating AI Tools into Writing Classes. Journal of Academic Writing, 15(S2), 1–7.

Earl, L. M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (1st ed.). Corwin press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zYh2AwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Earl+clearly+articulated+this+typology+in+her+influential+2003+book+%22Assessment+as+Learning:+Using+Classroom+Assessment+to+Maximize+Student+Learning.%22+In&ots=O8W4QeNErN&sig=hRMPx1fjUhHhtw2rHlT_EVWZhHY

Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of educational measurement. Prentice-Hall.

Fitzgerald, R. (2025). Inquiry in Action: Using AI to Reimagine Learning and Teaching: Case Studies from the Frontline of Higher Education Practice. The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/a18431b

Fuchs, M. (2026, February 16). Hulporganisaties zetten AI-beelden vol stereotypen in om fondsen te werven. Trouw. https://www.trouw.nl/buitenland/hulporganisaties-zetten-ai-beelden-vol-stereotypen-in-om-fondsen-te-werven~b5f3a569/

Gallant, B. (Host). (2025, November 10). Episode 36: Cath Ellis (No. 36) [Broadcast]. https://www.theoppositeofcheating.com/post/episode-36-cath-ellis

Gelder, T. van. (2005). Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48

Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1110

Hanshaw, G., & Sullivan, C. (2025). Exploring barriers to AI course assistant adoption: A mixed-methods study on student non-utilization. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00312-x

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Henkel, O., Hills, L., Boxer, A., Roberts, B., & Levonian, Z. (2024). Can Large Language Models Make the Grade? An Empirical Study Evaluating LLMs Ability To Mark Short Answer Questions in K-12 Education. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3664693

Hill, K. (2025, May 14). College Professors Are Using ChatGPT. Some Students Aren’t Happy. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/14/technology/chatgpt-college-professors.html

Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515012

Jemstedt, A. (2024). Enhancing learning with a two-page study manual. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101852

Johnson, M., & Zhang, M. (2024). Examining the responsible use of zero-shot AI approaches to scoring essays. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 30064.

Joint Quality Initiative. (2004). Shared “Dublin” descriptors for Short Cycle, First Cycle, Second Cycle and Third Cycle Awards. http://www.jointquality.nl

Jones, A. (2015). A Disciplined Approach to Critical Thinking. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 169–182). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_11

Jones, L. R. (2011). Academic integrity & academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating & plagiarism. https://repository.fit.edu/library_publications/1/

Joughin, G. (1998). Dimensions of oral assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230404

Joughin, G. (2010). A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds Metropolitan University in association with University of Wollongong. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228844594_A_Short_Guide_to_Oral_Assessment

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Karlen, Y., Hirt, C. N., Jud, J., Rosenthal, A., & Eberli, T. D. (2023). Teachers as learners and agents of self-regulated learning: The importance of different teachers competence aspects for promoting metacognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104055

Kassorla, M. (2025, May 31). Inverted Bloom’s for the Age of AI [Substack newsletter]. THE ACADEMIC PLATYPUS. https://michellekassorla.substack.com/p/inverted-blooms-for-the-age-of-ai

Kestin, G., Miller, K., Klales, A., Milbourne, T., & Ponti, G. (2024). AI Tutoring Outperforms Active Learning. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4243877/v1

King’s College London. (2025, April). King’s guidance on generative AI for teaching, assessment and feedback. King’s College London. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349.

Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187.

Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 959–972. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193244

Kortemeyer, G. (2024). Performance of the pre-trained large language model GPT-4 on automated short answer grading. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00147-y

Korthals, L., Akrong, E., Geller, G., Rosenbusch, H., Grasman, R., & Visser, I. (2026). Towards Reliable LLM Grading Through Self-Consistency and Selective Human Review: Higher Accuracy, Less Work. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 8(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/make8030074

Korthals, L., Rosenbusch, H., Grasman, R., & Visser, I. (2025). Grading University Students with LLMs: Performance and Acceptance of a Canvas-Based Automation. In A. I. Cristea, E. Walker, Y. Lu, O. C. Santos, & S. Isotani (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium, Blue Sky, and WideAIED (Vol. 2591, pp. 36–43). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99264-3_5

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.

Kusumegi, K., Yang, X., Ginsparg, P., de Vaan, M., Stuart, T., & Yin, Y. (2025). Scientific production in the era of large language models. Science, 390(6779), 1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adw3000

Létourneau, A., Deslandes Martineau, M., Charland, P., Karran, J. A., Boasen, J., & Léger, P. M. (2025). A systematic review of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) in K-12 education. Npj Science of Learning, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00320-7

Li, C., Cui, H., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2026). The cognitive impact of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic review of critical and creative thinking outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100571

Liu, D. (2025, September 24). Assessment & The Two-Lane Approach by Prof. Danny Liu [Video recording]. https://video.edu.nl/w/sifbfxmBYbJbgkaPc6wq9e

Liu, D., & Bridgeman, A. (2023, July 12). What to do about assessments if we can’t out-design or out-run AI? – Teaching@Sydney. https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/teaching@sydney/what-to-do-about-assessments-if-we-cant-out-design-or-out-run-ai/

Lodge, J. M., & Loble, L. (2026). Artificial intelligence, cognitive offloading and implications for education [Report]. University of Technology Sydney. (Australia). https://apo.org.au/node/333716

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413

Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. (world). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071

Nicol, D. (2022). “ Turning Active Learning into Active Feedback”, Introductory Guide from Active Feedback Toolkit.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nicol, D., & Kushwah, L. (2024). Shifting feedback agency to students by having them write their own feedback comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2265080

Oakley, B., Johnston, M., Chen, K.-Z., Jung, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2025). The Memory Paradox: Why Our Brains Need Knowledge in an Age of AI (arXiv:2506.11015). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11015

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Cm6pDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&dq=Thinker%27s+Guide+Library+-+The+Miniature+Guide+to+Critical+Thinking+Concepts+and+Tools&ots=Yd6H9kDl-K&sig=j2E2Ji7V3Rv_1xdsXq8kxTD41qI

Pearson, H. (2025). Universities are embracing AI: Will students get smarter or stop thinking? Nature, 646(8086), 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03340-w

Pedro, door. (2017, April 19). Een wat langer stuk over de taxonomie van Bloom. Blogcollectief Onderzoek Onderwijs. https://onderzoekonderwijs.net/2017/04/19/een-wat-langer-stuk-over-de-taxonomie-van-bloom/

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Perring, G. (2025, October 7). Embracing AI in international higher education. European Association for International Education. https://www.eaie.org/resource/embracing-ai-in-international-higher-education-transforming-learning-supporting-diversity-and-preparing-for-the-future.html

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Ryan, T., Henderson, M., Ryan, K., & Kennedy, G. (2023). Identifying the components of effective learner-centred feedback information. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1565–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1913723

Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020003002

Shah, P., Mishra, D., Shanmugam, M., Vighnesh, M. J., & Jayaraj, H. (2022). Acceptability of artificial intelligence-based retina screening in general population. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 70(4), 1140. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1840_21

Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132–2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015

Stasuik, N. C. (2025, April 28). Evaluating LLM Performance in Essay Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of AI Grading and Feedback Systems for University English Courses. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0448868

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65.

Stephenson, Z., Johnson-Glauch, N., & Cruchley, S. (2025). Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: A systematic review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2504621

Theobold, A. S. (2021). Oral exams: A more meaningful assessment of students’ understanding. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1914527

TLC University of Amsterdam. (2025). AI Literacy for teachers. Articulate. https://share.articulate.com/RoMQC5qv9KmeRmXFLQtsd

van Berkel, H., Bax, A., & Joosten-ten Brinke, D. (Eds.). (2014). Toetsen in het hoger onderwijs. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0239-0

Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2015). Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: A synthesis of research in higher education. Educational Research Review, 14, 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.002

Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111–119.

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113210

Vermunt, J. D. H. M., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Watkins, M. (2026, March 12). OpenAI’s Education Pitch Has a Free Version Problem [Substack newsletter]. Rhetorica. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/openais-education-pitch-has-a-free?utm_medium=android&triedRedirect=true

Wewetzer, L., Goetz, K., Freischmidt, S., & Steinhauser, J. (2026). Trust in AI-Supported Screening in General Practice Among Urban and Rural Citizens: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 14(1), e69777. https://doi.org/10.2196/69777

Wiliam, D. (2017, April 4). @Doug_Lemov @DavidDidau I agree. My two cents’ worth, with knowledge as the foundation on which all the others are built... Https://t.co/xjyFzs64Pl [Tweet]. Twitter. https://x.com/dylanwiliam/status/849277989577789441

Winstone, N. E., Gravett, K., Bearman, M., Noble, C., Jensen, L. X., Jones, A., & Nicola-Richmond, K. (2026). The care-full craft of feedback in an age of generative AI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2643333

Yavariabdi, A., Paudel, B., Carleton, T., & De Almeida, C. D. A. (2025). Generative AI in Assessment and Feedback Generation in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. 2025 International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (ICETC), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC66579.2025.11387416

Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences. US Government Printing Office.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0